Family
Staunton
87 named individuals sharing the Staunton surname-sound, across 2,308 entries. This grouping clusters spelling variants that sound alike; it may include distinct families that happen to share a sound, and it cannot merge unrelated spellings of one family (e.g. Bello Campo/Beauchamp), treat it as a research aid, not an assertion of kinship.
Surnames counted here remove or add families; this changes only your view, never the data.
Spellings in this family: “Stainton” · “Standen” · “Standon” · “Standon'” · “Stanton” · “Stantona” · “Staunden” · “Staundon” · “Staundoun” · “Staunton” · “Stauntun” · “Stayndon” · “Staynton” · “Steynton” · “Steynton'”
Curate these spellings (suggest a connection, or flag one as wrong)
Possibly the same family (suggestions, not merged)
Similar-sounding surnames, plus spellings the printed General Index itself links (marked index, the editors' own cross-references). Preview combines them on screen so you can judge; nothing changes until a human confirms.
Request a permanent merge
Showing the 77 people named in 2+ entries; 10 single-mention people hidden for clarity. Show everyone
Family timeline (1235 to 1483, well-attested members)
The pale bar spans each person’s first to last dated entry; each tick is one entry — click a tick to open it. Same forename with separated bars usually means successive generations (father/son); overlapping bars are contemporaries.
span of activity · one entry · entry under another married name · inferred (named through a relative)
Members by forename (medieval families reuse names; date order separates the generations)
Autocombine identities: on Spellings of one probable person are folded together (Bartholomeus with Bartholomew; index-linked surnames included). Click a combined row to see every separate spelling. Display only, the data is unchanged.
Report a problem
Spotted an error — a wrong date or place, a misread text, people wrongly combined or split? Reports keep the corpus trustworthy.