Work in progress. People, families and relationships are auto-extracted and unverified.

Family

Lay

65 named individuals sharing the Lay surname-sound, across 3,979 entries. This grouping clusters spelling variants that sound alike; it may include distinct families that happen to share a sound, and it cannot merge unrelated spellings of one family (e.g. Bello Campo/Beauchamp), treat it as a research aid, not an assertion of kinship.

Surnames counted here remove or add families; this changes only your view, never the data.

Spellings in this family: “Laceo” · “Laceyo” · “Laci” · “Lacy” · “Lais” · “Las” · “Lasci” · “Lascy” · “Lasey” · “Lasie” · “Lassy” · “Laue” · “Lay” · “Lays”

Curate these spellings (suggest a connection, or flag one as wrong)

Possibly the same family (suggestions, not merged)

Similar-sounding surnames, plus spellings the printed General Index itself links (marked index, the editors' own cross-references). Preview combines them on screen so you can judge; nothing changes until a human confirms.

Request a permanent merge

Showing the 58 people named in 2+ entries; 7 single-mention people hidden for clarity. Show everyone

Family timeline (1232 to 1484, well-attested members)

The pale bar spans each person’s first to last dated entry; each tick is one entry — click a tick to open it. Same forename with separated bars usually means successive generations (father/son); overlapping bars are contemporaries.

Robert de Lacy 1251
1348
Robert Lassy 1403
1415
John de Lascy 1232
1480
Richard de Lacy 1278
1444
Thomas de Lacy 1318
1471
Walter de Lascy 1234
1430
Alice de Lascy 1259
1337
Henry de Lacy 1247
1477
Nicholas Lacy 1329
1441
Peter de Lacy 1268
1382
William de Lascy 1262
1484
Adam de Lacy 1265
1465
Alesia de Lacy 1256
1348
Alesya de Lacy 1285
1285
Alexander de Lacy 1279
1279
Allesia de Lascy 1293
1293
Almaric de Lascy 1318
1319
Almarick de Lascy 1340
1342
Amice de Lacy 1309
1312
Anthony de Lacy 1313
1340
Bernard de Lay 1255
1255
Comite de Laci 1317
1317
David Lacy 1380
1380
Edmund de Lacy 1245
1407
Edward Lay 1341
1344
Emelina de Lacy 1242
1283
Emery de Lacy 1243
1252
Garsie de Las 1329
1329
Gilbert de Lacy 1234
1342
Hugh de Lascy 1234
1467
James de Lacy 1284
1386
Joan de Lacy 1273
1331
Margaret de Lacy 1232
1365
Margerie de Lacy 1265
1342
Maud de Lacy 1241
1342
Philip atte Lays 1414
1415
Roesia de Lacy 1265
1265
Roger de Lacy 1261
1340
Stephen Lacy 1377
1406
Wenthlian de Lacy 1311
1311

span of activity · one entry · entry under another married name · inferred (named through a relative)

Members by forename (medieval families reuse names; date order separates the generations)

Autocombine identities: on Spellings of one probable person are folded together (Bartholomeus with Bartholomew; index-linked surnames included). Click a combined row to see every separate spelling. Display only, the data is unchanged.

Robert ×4

John ×3

  • John de Lascy · 1232-11-22 – 1480-09-15 · 398 entries · 3 spellings, probably one person; click to separate

Richard ×3

Thomas ×3

Walter ×3

Alice ×2

  • Alice de Lascy · 1259-05-08 – 1337-05-04 · 22 entries · 2 spellings, probably one person; click to separate

Henry ×2

  • Henry de Lacy · 1247-08-07 – 1477-05-10 · 1,645 entries · 2 spellings, probably one person; click to separate

Nicholas ×2

  • Nicholas Lacy · 1329-02-20 – 1441-09-26 · 20 entries · 2 spellings, probably one person; click to separate

Peter ×2

  • Peter de Lacy · 1268-02-12 – 1382-03-15 · 71 entries · 2 spellings, probably one person; click to separate

William ×2

  • William de Lascy · 1262-08-05 – 1484-02-21 · 130 entries · 2 spellings, probably one person; click to separate

Adam ×1

Alesia ×1

Alesya ×1

Alexander ×1

Allesia ×1

Almaric ×1

Almarick ×1

Amice ×1

Anthony ×1

Bernard ×1

Comite ×1

David ×1

Edmund ×1

Edward ×1

  • Edward Lay · 1341-08-11 – 1344-08-11 · 4 entries

Emelina ×1

Emery ×1

Garsie ×1

Gilbert ×1

Hugh ×1

James ×1

Joan ×1

Margaret ×1

Margerie ×1

Maud ×1

Philip ×1

Roesia ×1

Roger ×1

Stephen ×1

Wenchelana ×1

Wentheliana ×1

Wenthlian ×1

Wenthliana ×1

Tick people, then compare

Report a problem

Spotted an error — a wrong date or place, a misread text, people wrongly combined or split? Reports keep the corpus trustworthy.