Person
Reginald le Ropere
In the printed indexes 2
Ropere, Reginald le pp. 282 · Ropere, Reginald le pp. 282
The volume editors' own General Index entries whose name matches this person — the curated authority for spellings, county and capacity. Page numbers are the printed pages.
Over time
Acts by type
Where
Top places
- Kings Langley (Hertfordshire) 2
Named alongside
Possibly the same person, or kin
Others in the Ropere family. Same forename + overlapping dates may be one identity (e.g. a remarried woman, or a mis-split father/son). See the whole family →
- John le Ropere · 1293-09-12 – 1484-10-28 · 105 entries
- William le Ropere · 1270-08-21 – 1439-06-01 · 20 entries
- Nicholas le Roper · 1318-05-17 – 1348-02-18 · 19 entries
- Robert le Roper · 1270-08-21 – 1465-05-15 · 15 entries
- William Roper · 1331-02-07 – 1449-11-17 · 15 entries
- Henry Ropere · 1383-11-28 – 1385-01-22 · 10 entries
- Alexander le Roper · 1350-05-13 – 1350-05-18 · 9 entries
- Richard Roper · 1432-09-24 – 1439-11-09 · 8 entries
- Ordwy le Ropere · 1256-02-06 – 1256-02-07 · 7 entries
- Thomas le Roper · 1316-05-04 – 1466-02-04 · 6 entries
Similarly-spelled families (suggestions, not merged)
These surnames sound close to Ropere (e.g. Warenna/Warenne, Conestable/Constable). They are kept separate on purpose, some look-alikes are genuinely different families (Clare vs Claver). If you are sure two are one family, tell us to merge them.
Name variants
- “Reginald le Ropere” ×3
Entries (chronological)
Coloured edge = reign:Hen IIIEdw IEdw IIEdw IIIRic IIHen IVHen VHen VIEdw IVRic IIIHen VII
-
1331-02-16 date: inferred auto-linked
Cancelled on payment, acknowledged by Nicholas Simonetti de Luca, attorney of Asselinus. Simon de Perepount acknowledges that he owes to Roesia, late the wife of Hugh de Loundresford, 40 marks: to be levied, in default o…
-
1331-02-16 date: inferred auto-linked
Cancelled on payment, acknowledged by Nicholas Simonetti de Luca, attorney of Asselinus. Simon de Perepount acknowledges that he owes to Roesia, late the wife of Hugh de Loundresford, 40 marks: to be levied, in default o…
Report a problem
Spotted an error — a wrong date or place, a misread text, people wrongly combined or split? Reports keep the corpus trustworthy.