Person
John le Pee
In the printed indexes 2
Pee, John pp. 611 · Pee, John pp. 231, 16, 69
The volume editors' own General Index entries whose name matches this person — the curated authority for spellings, county and capacity. Page numbers are the printed pages.
Over time
Acts by type
Where
Top places
- Westminster (Middlesex) 2
- Carnarvon (Caernarfonshire) 1
Named alongside
Possibly the same person, or kin
Others in the Pee family. Same forename + overlapping dates may be one identity (e.g. a remarried woman, or a mis-split father/son). See the whole family →
- John Peye same forename · 1321-05-07 – 1379-12-03 · 5 entries
- John le Peu same forename · 1292-01-26 · 2 entries
- Philip Peye · 1311-07-20 – 1331-07-12 · 12 entries
- Reynold Pey · 1387-12-28 – 1390-03-08 · 6 entries
Similarly-spelled families (suggestions, not merged)
These surnames sound close to Pee (e.g. Warenna/Warenne, Conestable/Constable). They are kept separate on purpose, some look-alikes are genuinely different families (Clare vs Claver). If you are sure two are one family, tell us to merge them.
Name variants
- “John Pee” ×2
- “John le Pee” ×2
Entries (chronological)
Coloured edge = reign:Hen IIIEdw IEdw IIEdw IIIRic IIHen IVHen VHen VIEdw IVRic IIIHen VII
-
1284-08-17 date: inferred auto-linked
Protection and safe-conduct, until Christmas, for John Pee of Argent and Martin le Bel, men of the abbot of St. Werburg, Chester, going by sea to buy victuals for his use. 4.…
-
1378-03-22 date: inferred auto-linked
The like, in favour of John le Pee, servant of queen Isabella, the late king's mother, of letters patent, dated 18 March, 40 Edward III., being a like grant to him, for life, of 2d. daily. By the Great Council. 22.…
-
1401-05-01 date: inferred auto-linked
Inspeximus and confirmation to John le Pee of letters patent dated 9 March, 1 Richard II, inspecting and confirming letters patent dated 18 March, 40 Edward III, granting to him for life 2d. daily at the Exchequer ; and …
Report a problem
Spotted an error — a wrong date or place, a misread text, people wrongly combined or split? Reports keep the corpus trustworthy.