Person
Hugh Bokenham
In the printed indexes 1
Bokenham, Hugh esquire pp. 270
The volume editors' own General Index entries whose name matches this person — the curated authority for spellings, county and capacity. Page numbers are the printed pages.
Over time
Acts by type
Where
Top places
- Westminster (Middlesex) 2
Named alongside
Possibly the same person, or kin
Others in the Bokenham family. Same forename + overlapping dates may be one identity (e.g. a remarried woman, or a mis-split father/son). See the whole family →
- John Bokenham · 1331-03-12 – 1477-02-15 · 36 entries
- Robert de Bokenham · 1341-06-01 – 1389-07-26 · 18 entries
- William de Bokenham · 1310-07-08 – 1383-10-16 · 15 entries
- Edmund de Bokenham · 1349-01-16 – 1450-12-14 · 15 entries
- Simon de Bokenham · 1368-10-05 – 1393-12-20 · 9 entries
- Roger Bokenham · 1315-04-02 – 1393-12-20 · 8 entries
- Roger de Bokenham · 1315-04-02 · 7 entries
- Thomas de Bokenham · 1316-11-20 – 1461-07-25 · 6 entries
- Ralph de Bokenham · 1346-03-17 – 1346-04-08 · 3 entries
Similarly-spelled families (suggestions, not merged)
These surnames sound close to Bokenham (e.g. Warenna/Warenne, Conestable/Constable). They are kept separate on purpose, some look-alikes are genuinely different families (Clare vs Claver). If you are sure two are one family, tell us to merge them.
Name variants
- “Hugh Bokenham” ×2
- “Hugh de Bokenham” ×1
Entries (chronological)
Coloured edge = reign:Hen IIIEdw IEdw IIEdw IIIRic IIHen IVHen VHen VIEdw IVRic IIIHen VII
-
1404-03-24 date: inferred auto-linked
The like to the following in the counties and places named : Thomas Hayton, John Hatheresham, Ralph Codyngton, John Sooghton, John Wanteley, Walter Hoke, William Melborne, and the sheriff; Surrey, except the town of Suth…
-
1444-07-10 date: inferred auto-linked
Licence, for 100s. paid in the hanaper, for Robert Asshefeld, esquire, to enfeoff Hugh Bokenham, esquire, and Walter Gerard, clerk, of the manor of Lytelhaugh, co. Suffolk, held in chief, and for them to grant the same t…
Report a problem
Spotted an error — a wrong date or place, a misread text, people wrongly combined or split? Reports keep the corpus trustworthy.