Prior Of Caldewell
3 recorded holders. religious office ← all offices
The succession the rolls themselves record for this office, earliest first — a finding aid drawn from the roll text, not an authoritative fasti. Spelling variants of one holder now fold together where the volumes' own printed indexes attest them (“Burghers” and “Burghersh” are one man when the editors say so); the opposite case — one name hiding two men — is proposed from the same indexes and from matched identities, and separates only after human confirmation. Until then a shared name lists as one holder, and the list can be checked against printed succession lists (Fasti / VCH).
-
Hugh de Bello Campo
1321
- 1321-09-29 — Hugh de Bello Campo, prior of Caldewell near Bedford, for himself and convent, that he owes to Nicholas Ceriolo, of Genoa, 100/.; to be levied, in default of pa…
-
William de Suldrop
1342
×3
- 1342-02-05 — Exemplification, at the request of William de Suldrop, prior of Caldewell, of a certificate of the treasurer and barons of the exchequer, as followa i ; In the …
- 1342-02-05 — Protection with clause volumus, for one year, for Agnes wife of John Mautravers, going beyond the seas on the king's service. By K. 26. _Exemplification, at the…
-
Ralph de Derby
1354
×2
- 1354-06-20 — John son of John Ferour of Northampton, parson of the church of Tyyllyngston Dansy, co. Oxford, acknowledges that he owes to Thomas de Brembre, clerk, 120/.; to…
Ordered by the first date each holder appears with the office — where a holder is undated
they sort last. Dates are the roll entries' own, not tenure dates.
Cite: “prior of Caldewell”, Reading the Rolls, https://readingtherolls.com/office/prior-of-caldewell, accessed 2026-07-25. Derived from the printed calendars of the medieval English royal records.
Report a problem
Spotted an error — a wrong date or place, a misread text, people wrongly combined or split? Reports keep the corpus trustworthy.