Work in progress. People, families and relationships are auto-extracted and unverified.

Earl Of Warwyk

Warwyk. 1 recorded holder. ← all offices

The succession the rolls themselves record for this office, earliest first — a finding aid drawn from the roll text, not an authoritative fasti. Spelling variants of one holder now fold together where the volumes' own printed indexes attest them (“Burghers” and “Burghersh” are one man when the editors say so); the opposite case — one name hiding two men — is proposed from the same indexes and from matched identities, and separates only after human confirmation. Until then a shared name lists as one holder, and the list can be checked against printed succession lists (Fasti / VCH).

  1. William de Bello Campo 1297 ×3
    • 1297-03-03 — Association of John de Clinton of Coleshull, in the room of Simon de Ellesworth, now deceased, with Nicholas de Warewyk in a commission of oyer and terminer dir…
    • 1297-03-20 — Association of John de Clinton of Ooleshull, in the room of Simon de Ellesworth, now deceased, with Nicholas de Warewyk in a commission of oyer and terminer dir…

Ordered by the first date each holder appears with the office — where a holder is undated they sort last. Dates are the roll entries' own, not tenure dates.
Cite: “earl of Warwyk”, Reading the Rolls, https://readingtherolls.com/office/earl-of-warwyk, accessed 2026-07-25. Derived from the printed calendars of the medieval English royal records.

Report a problem

Spotted an error — a wrong date or place, a misread text, people wrongly combined or split? Reports keep the corpus trustworthy.