Work in progress. People, families and relationships are auto-extracted and unverified.

Earl Of Warrewik

3 recorded holders. ← all offices

The succession the rolls themselves record for this office, earliest first — a finding aid drawn from the roll text, not an authoritative fasti. Spelling variants of one holder now fold together where the volumes' own printed indexes attest them (“Burghers” and “Burghersh” are one man when the editors say so); the opposite case — one name hiding two men — is proposed from the same indexes and from matched identities, and separates only after human confirmation. Until then a shared name lists as one holder, and the list can be checked against printed succession lists (Fasti / VCH).

  1. Guy de Bello Campo 1318 ×3
    • 1318-03-18 — Grant to Hugh le Despenser, the elder, in consideration of 67701. in which the king is bound to him for divers causes, of the custody of the lands and tenements…
    • 1318-03-19 — Grant to Hugh le Despenser, the elder, in consideration of 6770l. in which the king is bound to him for divers causes, of the custody of the lands and tenements…
  2. Thomas de Bello Campo 1346 ×3
    • 1346-05-20 — Memorandum that both the earl and John came into chancery at Porchester on 27 June and acknowledged the preceding indenture. Thomas de Bello Campo, earl of Warr…
    • 1346-06-27 — Memorandum that both the earl and John came into chancery at Poron 27 June and acknowledged the preceding indenture. Thomas de Bello Campo, earl of Warrewik, ac…
  3. Thomas de Beauchamp 1372
    • 1372-07-30 — To the sheriffs of London. Order, upon the petition of Thomas Hoggeshawe knight, by mainprise of Nicholas Peeke, Richard Asshehurst and John Malepert of London,…

Ordered by the first date each holder appears with the office — where a holder is undated they sort last. Dates are the roll entries' own, not tenure dates.
Cite: “earl of Warrewik”, Reading the Rolls, https://readingtherolls.com/office/earl-of-warrewik, accessed 2026-07-25. Derived from the printed calendars of the medieval English royal records.

Report a problem

Spotted an error — a wrong date or place, a misread text, people wrongly combined or split? Reports keep the corpus trustworthy.