Work in progress. People, families and relationships are auto-extracted and unverified.

Earl Of Warewyk

2 recorded holders. ← all offices

The succession the rolls themselves record for this office, earliest first — a finding aid drawn from the roll text, not an authoritative fasti. Spelling variants of one holder now fold together where the volumes' own printed indexes attest them (“Burghers” and “Burghersh” are one man when the editors say so); the opposite case — one name hiding two men — is proposed from the same indexes and from matched identities, and separates only after human confirmation. Until then a shared name lists as one holder, and the list can be checked against printed succession lists (Fasti / VCH).

  1. Thomas de Bello Campo 1333 ×3
    • 1333-06-11 — the sheriff of Warwick. Order to restore to Robert de Milverton, his lands, goods and chattels which had been taken into the king's on his being summoned before…
    • 1333-06-11 — To the sheriff of Warwick. Order to restore to Robert de Milverton, his lands, goods and chattels which had been taken into the king's on his being summoned bef…
  2. Thomas de Beauchamp 1369 ×2
    • 1369-02-12 — 43 KDWARD III. 69 Fraunceys of London in Kenyngton, Ditton and Estmallyngg Kent with all commodities etc. thereto belonging. Dated London, 43 Edward III. of ack…

Ordered by the first date each holder appears with the office — where a holder is undated they sort last. Dates are the roll entries' own, not tenure dates.
Cite: “earl of Warewyk”, Reading the Rolls, https://readingtherolls.com/office/earl-of-warewyk, accessed 2026-07-25. Derived from the printed calendars of the medieval English royal records.

Report a problem

Spotted an error — a wrong date or place, a misread text, people wrongly combined or split? Reports keep the corpus trustworthy.