Archdeacon Of Rychemund
3 recorded holders. ← all offices
The succession the rolls themselves record for this office, earliest first — a finding aid drawn from the roll text, not an authoritative fasti. Spelling variants of one holder now fold together where the volumes' own printed indexes attest them (“Burghers” and “Burghersh” are one man when the editors say so); the opposite case — one name hiding two men — is proposed from the same indexes and from matched identities, and separates only after human confirmation. Until then a shared name lists as one holder, and the list can be checked against printed succession lists (Fasti / VCH).
- Simon de Evesham 1259
-
Henry de Newerk
1286
×3
- 1286-02-28 — to Master Bonettus de Sancto Quintino, king's clerk, of a prebend the church of Southwell, void by the promotion of Sanctius de Pynea, of Tripoli ( Trirolitanum…
-
Henry de Walton
1350–1352
×6
- 1351-07-08 — Richard de Haveryng, knight, acknowledges that he owes to Henry de Walton, archdeacon of Rychemund, and to Hugh de Berwyk 1002.; to be levied, in default of pay…
- 1351-07-08 — Richard de Haveryng, knight, acknowledges that he owes to Henry de Walton, archdeacon of Rychemund, and to Hugh de Berwyk 1001.; to levied, in default of paymen…
- 1351-07-29 — Richard de Sancto Johanne acknowledges that he owes to Henry de Walton, archdeacon of Rychemund, 801. ; to be levied etc. in Devon.
- 1352-07-04 — son of John Jardyn of Mulleford acknowledges that he owes to atte Broke of Andevere 10/.; to be levied etc. in the county of de Norwico, citizen and goldsmith o…
- 1352-07-04 — John son of John Jardyn of Mulleford acknowledges that he owes to atte Broke of Andevere 10/.; to be levied etc. in the county of Southampton. Robert de Norwico…
Ordered by the first date each holder appears with the office — where a holder is undated
they sort last. Dates are the roll entries' own, not tenure dates.
Cite: “archdeacon of Rychemund”, Reading the Rolls, https://readingtherolls.com/office/archdeacon-of-rychemund, accessed 2026-07-25. Derived from the printed calendars of the medieval English royal records.
Report a problem
Spotted an error — a wrong date or place, a misread text, people wrongly combined or split? Reports keep the corpus trustworthy.