Archbishop Of Armagh
3 recorded holders. religious office ← all offices
The succession the rolls themselves record for this office, earliest first — a finding aid drawn from the roll text, not an authoritative fasti. Spelling variants of one holder now fold together where the volumes' own printed indexes attest them (“Burghers” and “Burghersh” are one man when the editors say so); the opposite case — one name hiding two men — is proposed from the same indexes and from matched identities, and separates only after human confirmation. Until then a shared name lists as one holder, and the list can be checked against printed succession lists (Fasti / VCH).
-
Walter de Jorse
1307
×2
- 1307-08-25 — The like to Edmund Deyncurt, Adam de Welle, Juliana de Gaunt and Robert de Malberthorpe. Remission to Walter Jorz, archbishop of Armagh, of payment of the fine …
-
Stephen de Segrave
1325
×3
- 1325-02-10 — Hugh de Turpyngton, knight, acknowledges that he owes to the king 100 marks; to be levied, in default of payment, of his lands and chattels in England and Irela…
- 1325-02-10 — Hugh de Turpyngton, knight, acknowledges that he owes to the king 100 marks; to be levied, in default of payment, of his lands and chattels in England and Irela…
-
Edmund Connesburgh
1477
- 1477-07-08 — Grant to Edmund Connesburgh, archbishop of Armagh, of the custody of the temporalities of the archbishopric so long as they remain in the king's hands. ([Federa…
Ordered by the first date each holder appears with the office — where a holder is undated
they sort last. Dates are the roll entries' own, not tenure dates.
Cite: “archbishop of Armagh”, Reading the Rolls, https://readingtherolls.com/office/archbishop-of-armagh, accessed 2026-07-25. Derived from the printed calendars of the medieval English royal records.
Report a problem
Spotted an error — a wrong date or place, a misread text, people wrongly combined or split? Reports keep the corpus trustworthy.