Work in progress. People, families and relationships are auto-extracted and unverified.

Family

Conquest

6 named individuals sharing the Conquest surname-sound, across 219 entries. This grouping clusters spelling variants that sound alike; it may include distinct families that happen to share a sound, and it cannot merge unrelated spellings of one family (e.g. Bello Campo/Beauchamp), treat it as a research aid, not an assertion of kinship.

Surnames counted here remove or add families; this changes only your view, never the data.

↺ Reset to the original Conquest family

Spellings in this family: “Conquest” · “Conquet”

Curate these spellings (suggest a connection, or flag one as wrong)

Preview of 3 families combined (nothing saved). Back to Conquest

Family timeline (1225 to 1485, well-attested members)

The pale bar spans each person’s first to last dated entry; each tick is one entry — click a tick to open it. Same forename with separated bars usually means successive generations (father/son); overlapping bars are contemporaries.

Maurice de Conquet 1337
1342
Henry Conquest 1383
1400
John Conquest 1292
1485
Norman Conquest 1225
1445
Thomas Conquest 1360
1360

span of activity · one entry · entry under another married name · inferred (named through a relative)

Members by forename (medieval families reuse names; date order separates the generations)

Autocombine identities: on Spellings of one probable person are folded together (Bartholomeus with Bartholomew; index-linked surnames included). Click a combined row to see every separate spelling. Display only, the data is unchanged.

Maurice ×2

Henry ×1

John ×1

Norman ×1

Thomas ×1

Tick people, then compare

Report a problem

Spotted an error — a wrong date or place, a misread text, people wrongly combined or split? Reports keep the corpus trustworthy.