1322-07-30, Newcastle upon Tyne

Vacated because otherwise below. The following came to the king with Robert de Holand, and after being imprisoned for a time have found mainprise of their good behaviour towards the king under the following penalties : Richard de Holand, knight, has found as mainpernors Robert de Beaumond, William de Parys, knights, Ellis Martel of the county of Lincoln and Thurstan de Holand of the county of Lancaster, each of whom has mainprised under a penalty of 401. Walter de Kirkebride, knight, has found as mainpernors Matthew de Daunay, Robert Parvyng, John de Fetherstanhalgh and Nicholas Tempest, each of whom has mainprised under a penalty of 401. John de Kirkebride, knight, has found as mainpernors Alan de Rothewell, William de Stochyth, John de Toures and William Dalason, each of whom has mainprised under a penalty of 401. Adam de Reresby, knight, has found as mainpernors William de Chaddesdene, Henry de Haydok, Roger de Baukewelle and John de Rouneslay, of the county of Derby, each of whom has mainprised under a penalty of 401. Gilbert de Haydok has found as mainpernors Robert de Cliderhou, clerk, and John de Cliderhou, of the county of Lancaster, each of whom has mainprised under a penalty of 201. John de Holand has found as mainpernors Henry Gilibrond and Henry de Hermethorn of the county of Lancaster, each of whom has mainprised under a penalty of 201. Bertinus Bacoun of the county of York has found as mainpernors, in the form of a record without letters, Robert de Melton, Robert de Bouthum, of the county of York, and William Bacoun of the county of Westmoreland, each of whom has mainprised under a penalty of 40/., and he is to sue the king for the making of his ransom. John Strug, knight, of the county of Wilts has found as mainpernors, in the form of a record without letters, John Averey and John Peres of the county of Gloucester, each of whom has mainprised under a penalty of 40 marks, By ps. . 169 following, taken and impeached for the causes aforesaid, have by grace of the king for God : de Routhe has nothing in goods [and] has given security and departed quit for God. de Alden has nothing etc. as above. de Clifford and Michael de Crokedeyk have nothing etc. as de Percy has done no evil, as he recalls to mind (recordatur) the council, and has made security by oath and departed de Manston, William de Foston, Roger le Sergeaunt, Hugh John Curleu, John de Marston, John de Cumberhall, John Robert de Redynges and William de Fordham, poor hi sworn to be of good behaviour and have departed quit de Cheyne has nothing etc. and has sworn to be faithful king and is dismissed for God. Lengleys has nothing etc. as above. le Messager, a poor man, has sworn etc. and has departed God. de Stafford, a poor man, has sworn etc. and is dismissed by consent of all. le Boghier, Thomas son of Ralph of the county of Kent, de Kent, poor men, have sworn etc. and are dismissed de Nicole, arrested without cause, has sworn etc. and for God le Messager, a poor man, has sworn etc. and is dismissed de Beston surrendered to the king as a hostage for his then constable of the castle of Pontefract, and was not taken cause, has sworn etc. and is dismissed Geryn and Ralph Geryn of the county of Leicester have etc. and have sworn etc. and are dismissed for God. de Shaftesbury and William de Welle are poor men, have etc. and are dismissed for God. The following have made fines to save their lives and to have their lands : Edmund Hakelut of the county of Worcester has made fine in 100/. and has given security by oath etc. as above, and has found mainpernors for his behaviour, as is contained on the dorse.