1297-02-06, Walsingham
To Edmund, earl of Cornwall. Whereas the king has promised and is bound to cause his (vestrwm) sealt to be affixed to certain letters made concerning the alliance (confederacione) entered into between the king, for This schedule is now missing. The vestrum here would seem, from the separate reference to the earl's seal lower down, to be an error for nostrum, unless the latter is a mistake of vestro for nostro. . 13 and his heirs, on the one part, and Sir Guy, count of Flanders, and his heirs, on the other, together with the earl's (vestro) seal the seals of certain of the king's earls and barons; the king requests to cause his seal to be placed without delay to the said letters, which of the presents brings to him. like separately to Roger le Bygod, earl of Norfolk and marshal of Robert de Veer, earl of Oxford, and Robert son of Roger.
📄 Compare the scanned page
This text was read by machine from the public-domain scan below. Read the original to check any word — the marginal date/place column sits to the left of the body.
View on the Internet Archive → Public-domain source; full text via the Internet Archive.
People named
Also at Walsingham
Same act type
Browse other unclassified acts under Edward I.
Location
Flag a data issue
Spotted an error — a wrong date or place, a misread text, people wrongly combined or split? Reports keep the corpus trustworthy.