Work in progress. People, families and relationships are auto-extracted and unverified.

1333-05-28, Tweedmouth

To the sheriffs of London. Whereas the king has learned that John de Yakeslee, pavelionner, impleads Richard de Huntyngdon of York, before the justices of the Bench, for a certain trespass committed on him by Richard, at London, and the said Richard, because he did not come before the justices to answer John for the said trespass, is placed in exigent in the husting of that city to be outlawed, Richard being ignorant of the said exigent, and he found before the king in chancery William de Selby of York, Thomas Duraunt, John de Collum, William de Estryngton, Richard de Cessay, and William de Bukyngham, all of York, who undertook to have him before the said justices on the day when the king's writ of exigent is returnable, to answer John de Yakeslee for the said trespass; the king therefore orders the sheriffs to supersede the execution of the king's said writ of exigent against Richard in the meantime, by the said mainprise.

📄 Compare the scanned page Leaf 124 · printed p.112

This text was read by machine from the public-domain scan below. Read the original to check any word — the marginal date/place column sits to the left of the body.

Scanned image of leaf 124, printed page 112

View on the Internet Archive → Public-domain source; full text via the Internet Archive.

Location

Flag a data issue

Spotted an error — a wrong date or place, a misread text, people wrongly combined or split? Reports keep the corpus trustworthy.